After reading through Axel Brun's article on Web2.0 and "produsage" I read through Dr. Dennen's overview of the web, Web1.0, 2.0 and beyond. I appreciated Dr. Dennen's emphasis on the products of Web2.0 being an ongoing and living document. Thus a key component of Web2.0 documents is the ability to comment on them or to provide feedback through a like button. But of course is it always fun to reflect into the future on what Web3.0, 4.0 or 5.0 might be. In this regard Dr. Dennen's emphasis on search tools interacting with us on the web is different from other definitions I have heard of Web3.0, or I guess in this case we should say guesses at what Web3.0 might look like. When I think about the future of the web I am brought back to the final sections within Brun's article that I first read for the class where he focused on how Web2.0 would eventually be commercialized and used for profit. It is exactly this aspect which I have heard emphasized in other places as a key component around web3.0, namely through the use of blockchain technologies. A great summary of this version of Web3.0 can be found here during the recent congressional hearing on blockchain technologies. In this version of Web3.0 the consumers of information not only produce content as well, but also are sharers in the process of owning and maintaining the actual network on which the internet is run, through the blockchain ledger process. Thus, in this way, the general public can monetize their own actions on the internet, instead of that monetization being in the hands of a few large companies such as Amazon and Google. Thus in addition to further integratin of Artificial Intelligence to the web to customize the experience for me as the user/producer of content, I am also excited by the potential future opportunity to have the profit value of those actions in my own hands instead of it being sold by large corporations to advertisers.
Knowledge Communities On Pinterest
As the week is coming to an end for EME 6414 I thought I would go through one final reading for the week as I compose my final blog post. I took a look at an article from Hu, Torphy, Opperman, Jansen, and Lo regarding knowledge communities on Pinterest. They focus on the informal learning that takes place through Pinterest, an online platform where individuals can post images of projects that they have been working on to spark discussions regarding best practices in the classroom or other topics that may come up. Not surprisingly, the authors found that Pinterest was the most popular form of social media use to share technology ideas for the classroom. Through the process of sharing ideas, the authors point out that social capital is developed among educators on Pinterest through this unique Social Knowledge Community. This is simply to say that when teachers are looking for new ideas they turn to those that they see as peers and mentors through this social space. Yet, what ...
Hi, I really like your posting since I have thought about similar things, ethical concerns related to privacy issues on Web2.0 or more. I look forward to reading more interesting posting here! -Hunhui
ReplyDelete